Connect with us

Australia

Angry bride slams wedding guest’s thank you basket after she spent £34,000 on reception

Published

on

angry bride slams wedding guests thank you basket after she spent 34000 on reception

A bride slammed one of her guests’ thank you hamper, saying it was not good enough after she spent $200 on the guest and their date’s dinner. 

The bride, only identified as Laura and hailing from near Hamilton, in Canada, chastised the guest for sending the gift instead of a cash envelope after she had spent $34,000 to host 210 guests. 

The row, which was reported by the Hamilton Spectator, saw the guest, named Kathy, stand her ground, saying the bride had ‘the etiquette of a twig.’

People agreed with Kathy after the story resurfaced on Reddit, where many said Laura was being entitled and should have stuck to a wedding she could actually afford.  

A bride slammed one of her guests' thank you hamper, saying it was not good enough after she spent £118 on the guest and their date's dinner. The bride, only identified as Laura and hailing from near Hamilton, in Canada, chastised the guest for sending the gift (pictured) instead of an envelope after she had spent CA$34,000 (£19,805) to host 210 guests

A bride slammed one of her guests' thank you hamper, saying it was not good enough after she spent £118 on the guest and their date's dinner. The bride, only identified as Laura and hailing from near Hamilton, in Canada, chastised the guest for sending the gift (pictured) instead of an envelope after she had spent CA$34,000 (£19,805) to host 210 guests

A bride slammed one of her guests’ thank you hamper, saying it was not good enough after she spent £118 on the guest and their date’s dinner. The bride, only identified as Laura and hailing from near Hamilton, in Canada, chastised the guest for sending the gift (pictured) instead of an envelope after she had spent CA$34,000 (£19,805) to host 210 guests

The argument was sparked by Laura’s cold ‘thank you’-text to Kathy after she received the hamper, which contains different types of sweets and biscuits. 

It read: ‘I want to thank you for coming to the wedding Friday.

‘I’m not sure if it’s the first wedding you have been to, but for your next wedding … people give envelopes,’ it went on.

‘I lost out on $200 covering you and your date’s plate.… and got fluffy whip and Sour Patch Kids in return,’ the bride added. 

Some people were shocked by how rude and entitled the bride had behaved by asking the guest for a refund

Some people were shocked by how rude and entitled the bride had behaved by asking the guest for a refund

Some people were shocked by how rude and entitled the bride had behaved by asking the guest for a refund 

When Kathy said she disagreed and thought her gift was thoughtful, Laura said it did not quite measure up to the food, drinks and venue her guests enjoyed during her reception. 

She added: ‘Weddings are to make money for your future … not to pay for people’s meals.’

But Kathy hit back at Laura, saying: ‘It’s obvious you have the etiquette of a twig, I couldn’t care less of what you think about the gift you received.

‘”Normal” people would welcome anything given, you wanna have a party, you pay for it, DON’T expect me to,’ she snapped. 

Laura told the Spectator that Kathy was one of only two guests who did not give the happy couple money. 

33246274 8738459 image a 2 1600244707417

33246274 8738459 image a 2 1600244707417

Others pointed that some brides had accepted the gifts their guests had brought, assuming they didn't have money for more

Others pointed that some brides had accepted the gifts their guests had brought, assuming they didn't have money for more

Others pointed that some brides had accepted the gifts their guests had brought, assuming they didn’t have money for more 

She said her loved ones and friends had made fun of the hamper, which was still on display in her house days after the wedding.  

When the row, which took place over the summer, resurfaced on Reddit, many people thought Laura was being entitled.  

‘What planet is this horrible bride living on?’ one said. ‘If you don’t like or want the gift, then re-gift the damn thing and move on with your life, you rude hag. 

‘You do not write a snarky email to the guest informing them that they should have been aware that they were costing the bride X amount of money and their gift didn’t measure up,’ they added. 

‘The part where the bride displayed the gift basket so that others can mock it really made my blood boil. WTF happened to basic manners and respect? This family sucks,’ they went on. 

Another person pointed out not every wedding guest could afford to splash on pricey thank you gifts or cash.

33246282 8738459 image a 6 1600244745514

33246282 8738459 image a 6 1600244745514

Some people pointed the bride should have spent money on a wedding she could afford instead of expecting her guests to repay her

Some people pointed the bride should have spent money on a wedding she could afford instead of expecting her guests to repay her

Some people pointed the bride should have spent money on a wedding she could afford instead of expecting her guests to repay her 

‘”Weddings are to make money for your future”???? If you’re that desperate for money don’t blow $200 per person on a fancy wedding you don’t need,’ said another.  

‘What a j***. I remember not all my guests gave a card, and you know what, I loved that they were there to dance and laugh and eat with me. 

‘I had friends decline to come to my wedding because they couldn’t afford a gift, and I was so confused because I wasn’t inviting them for money. I was really hurt; I’d rather have had them there,’ they added.  

Meanwhile, someone pointed out that it’s inevitable to receive a few unusual wedding presents, and that most people are gracious about it. 

33246398 8738459 image a 8 1600245027448

33246398 8738459 image a 8 1600245027448

One person said they felt the expectation of expensive gifts or cash was 'strange' to them, and pointed out couples should not expect more from guests who had already taken the time to be there for their special day

One person said they felt the expectation of expensive gifts or cash was 'strange' to them, and pointed out couples should not expect more from guests who had already taken the time to be there for their special day

One person said they felt the expectation of expensive gifts or cash was ‘strange’ to them, and pointed out couples should not expect more from guests who had already taken the time to be there for their special day

‘My sister ended up with about six cheeseboards after her wedding, and didn’t complain. She found it pretty funny actually,’ one wrote. 

‘Have the wedding you can afford, period,’ one said. 

‘What an absolutely heinous person,’ said another. 

One person said they thought the expectation guests should splash on gifts was ‘strange.’

‘The expectation of expensive wedding gifts/cash is strange to me,’ they wrote. ‘Like, from parents or close family members, sure. But beyond that I don’t know.’

Powered by: Daily Mail

Australia

Emmy Awards 2020: Hugh Jackman is gracious in defeat

Published

on

By

emmy awards 2020 hugh jackman is gracious in defeat

Hugh Jackman has long been considered the ‘Nicest Guy in Hollywood’.

And the 51-year-old Australian actor lived up to his reputation on Sunday, during the first-ever virtual Emmy Awards ceremony.

In a live stream from his New York home, Hugh pumped his fist in the air and cheered on Mark Ruffalo, after losing out to the American actor in the Outstanding Lead Actor in a Limited Series or Movie Category. 

Emmy Awards 2020: 'The Nicest Guy in Hollywood' Hugh Jackman (pictured with wife Deborra-Lee Furness) was gracious in defeat as he lost to Mark Ruffalo for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Limited Series or Movie Category on Sunday

Emmy Awards 2020: 'The Nicest Guy in Hollywood' Hugh Jackman (pictured with wife Deborra-Lee Furness) was gracious in defeat as he lost to Mark Ruffalo for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Limited Series or Movie Category on Sunday

Emmy Awards 2020: ‘The Nicest Guy in Hollywood’ Hugh Jackman (pictured with wife Deborra-Lee Furness) was gracious in defeat as he lost to Mark Ruffalo for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Limited Series or Movie Category on Sunday 

Hugh, who appeared on screen alongside wife Deborra-Lee Furness, was nominated for his role as a corrupt school superintendent in HBO’s drama Bad Education.

As it was announced Mark, 52, had won the category for his portrayal of brothers Dominick and Thomas Birdsey in TV mini-series I Know This Much Is True, Hugh was gracious in defeat.

Sporting a crisp white dress shirt, a beaming Hugh cheered on Mark, pumping his fist in the air. 

Winner: As it was announced Mark (pictured with wife Sunrise Coigney), 52, had won the category for his portrayal of brothers Dominick and Thomas Birdsey in TV mini-series I Know This Much Is True, Hugh was gracious in defeat

Winner: As it was announced Mark (pictured with wife Sunrise Coigney), 52, had won the category for his portrayal of brothers Dominick and Thomas Birdsey in TV mini-series I Know This Much Is True, Hugh was gracious in defeat

Winner: As it was announced Mark (pictured with wife Sunrise Coigney), 52, had won the category for his portrayal of brothers Dominick and Thomas Birdsey in TV mini-series I Know This Much Is True, Hugh was gracious in defeat 

What a gentleman: Sporting a crisp white dress shirt, a beaming Hugh, 51, cheered on Mark, pumping his fist in the air

What a gentleman: Sporting a crisp white dress shirt, a beaming Hugh, 51, cheered on Mark, pumping his fist in the air

What a gentleman: Sporting a crisp white dress shirt, a beaming Hugh, 51, cheered on Mark, pumping his fist in the air 

Hugh plays Frank Tassone in the HBO drama Bad Education, which also airs on Foxtel in Australia.

Frank hoodwinked Long Island’s Roslyn High School, conning his way to millions to fund his extravagant lifestyle, before being sent to prison in 2006 for larceny.  

Hugh’s performance quickly received rave reviews, with USA TODAY branding it ‘great acting’, while Decider called it an ‘Oscar-worthy role’. 

Unique times: The Greatest Showman star watched the first-ever virtual Emmy Awards ceremony from his New York home (pictured)

Unique times: The Greatest Showman star watched the first-ever virtual Emmy Awards ceremony from his New York home (pictured)

Unique times: The Greatest Showman star watched the first-ever virtual Emmy Awards ceremony from his New York home (pictured) 

Nominated role: Hugh plays Frank Tassone, a corrupt superintendent who hoodwinked Long Island's Roslyn High School, before being sent to prison in 2006 for larceny

Nominated role: Hugh plays Frank Tassone, a corrupt superintendent who hoodwinked Long Island's Roslyn High School, before being sent to prison in 2006 for larceny

Nominated role: Hugh plays Frank Tassone, a corrupt superintendent who hoodwinked Long Island’s Roslyn High School, before being sent to prison in 2006 for larceny

In an interview with Variety in April, Hugh described the opportunity to portray the real-life school superintendent as ‘fascinating’.    

‘The role itself was something different from what I’ve done. I liked the idea of someone who is super successful, very, very good at what he did, beloved by the community – and fell down this slippery path,’ he said. 

Hugh also described playing the villain as ‘delicious’ in an interview with Collider.

‘As an actor, it just had so much to play with, and so many things that I’ve never really had the opportunity to play with. He’s seemingly very charming, but also just a viper… Those things, I just found really exciting to play,’ he said.  

Opportunity of a lifetime: In an interview with Variety in April, Hugh described the chance to portray the real-life school superintendent as 'fascinating'

Opportunity of a lifetime: In an interview with Variety in April, Hugh described the chance to portray the real-life school superintendent as 'fascinating'

Opportunity of a lifetime: In an interview with Variety in April, Hugh described the chance to portray the real-life school superintendent as ‘fascinating’

Powered by: Daily Mail

Continue Reading

Australia

Private details of almost 20,000 Australian university students leaked online in massive data breach

Published

on

By

private details of almost 20000 australian university students leaked online in massive data breach

Personal information belonging to almost 20,000 University of Tasmania students was mistakenly made public for more than five months due to security settings being configured incorrectly.

Affected students were on Monday informed of the breach, which made their data available to anyone with a UTAS email address from late February to August 11.

UTAS says analysis of the files has revealed a ‘number of users’ with university emails have accessed the information.  

About 20,000 pupils of the University of Tasmania (pictured) were on Monday informed their personal details were mistakenly made public for more than five months

About 20,000 pupils of the University of Tasmania (pictured) were on Monday informed their personal details were mistakenly made public for more than five months

About 20,000 pupils of the University of Tasmania (pictured) were on Monday informed their personal details were mistakenly made public for more than five months

The data, which contains personally identifiable information, is used to inform how the university supports students in their studies, UTAS says.

Bank account details were not part of the data breach.

‘Security settings on shared files were unintentionally configured incorrectly, which made the information visible and accessible to unauthorised users,’ the university said in a statement.

The university says it became aware of the breach on August 11 and has engaged independent experts to assist. 

The breach was due to security settings being configured incorrectly - allowing people with a UTAS email to access the information from February to August 11. Picture: A woman studying

The breach was due to security settings being configured incorrectly - allowing people with a UTAS email to access the information from February to August 11. Picture: A woman studying

The breach was due to security settings being configured incorrectly – allowing people with a UTAS email to access the information from February to August 11. Picture: A woman studying

The information made publicly available contained personally identifiable data, used to inform how the university supports the students in their studies. Bank account details were, however, not part of the data breach. Pictured: University students studying

The information made publicly available contained personally identifiable data, used to inform how the university supports the students in their studies. Bank account details were, however, not part of the data breach. Pictured: University students studying

The information made publicly available contained personally identifiable data, used to inform how the university supports the students in their studies. Bank account details were, however, not part of the data breach. Pictured: University students studying

‘I sincerely apologise to all students who have been affected by this incident,’ University of Tasmania Vice-Chancellor Rufus Black said.

‘We have undertaken a thorough review of how this information became accessible and took immediate steps to ensure it is secure.’

UTAS is in the process of contacting people who accessed the data and has ‘sought assurance’ that the files, or screenshots or shared copies of the files, have been permanently deleted.

Vice-Chancellor Professor Rufus Black added every student affected was on Monday contacted 'to explain what happened, to apologise, and to offer support.' He said the university (pictured) engaged independent experts to assist in securing the information

Vice-Chancellor Professor Rufus Black added every student affected was on Monday contacted 'to explain what happened, to apologise, and to offer support.' He said the university (pictured) engaged independent experts to assist in securing the information

Vice-Chancellor Professor Rufus Black added every student affected was on Monday contacted ‘to explain what happened, to apologise, and to offer support.’ He said the university (pictured) engaged independent experts to assist in securing the information

Information belonging to the 19,900 students was made public through Microsoft Office365 platform SharePoint, which is used to store, share and access files. 

Access privileges were incorrectly configured on an Office365 application, which displays content to users based on those privileges.

‘There is no evidence this data breach was a result of malicious activity,’ UTAS said.

‘The system has now been correctly configured.’

UTAS has set up a hotline for students with questions or concerns.

The university has since established a dedicated support line ¿ 1800 019 897 ¿ to assist students with any questions or concerns about the incident or their information. Pictured: A university student studying

The university has since established a dedicated support line ¿ 1800 019 897 ¿ to assist students with any questions or concerns about the incident or their information. Pictured: A university student studying

The university has since established a dedicated support line – 1800 019 897 – to assist students with any questions or concerns about the incident or their information. Pictured: A university student studying

Powered by: Daily Mail

Continue Reading

Australia

Scott Morrison slams ad attacking huge new income tax cuts

Published

on

By

scott morrison slams ad attacking huge new income tax cuts
Scott Morrison will try to get the economy back on track with the October 6 budget

Scott Morrison will try to get the economy back on track with the October 6 budget

Scott Morrison will try to get the economy back on track with the October 6 budget

Scott Morrison has hit back at an advert slamming potential tax cuts for millions of Australians. 

The October 6 budget is expected to bring forward tax cuts that were due in 2022, meaning middle and low income earners will be able to keep more of their money.

A TV advert produced by left-wing think tank The Australia Institute says the cuts risk damaging public services and won’t provide the stimulus the economy needs to recover from the coronavirus-caused recession.

A government spokesman criticised the campaign, telling Daily Mail Australia: ‘At a time of recession the Australia Institute want to take money out of people’s pockets.

‘We’re always focused on how we can give it back to them and lower taxes.

‘The Australia Institute and the Labor Party have never met a tax increase they didn’t like.’ 

The campaign is backed by 40 prominent Australians – including two former Reserve Bank officials, a former Liberal Party leader and the head of the welfare lobby group ACOSS. 

‘Cutting taxes for already wealthy Australians will undermine the long-term strength of our public services, like healthcare and education, while doing very little to stimulate economic growth,’ said Ben Oquist, Executive Director of The Australia Institute.

‘Tax is an investment in our society. Those calling for tax cuts today will be calling for service cuts in the future.’

Institute research released in recent weeks suggests the cuts will benefit high income earners, who are more likely to save rather than spend the extra cash.

‘We’ll need substantial stimulus for an extended period,’ former Reserve Bank deputy governor Stephen Grenville said.

‘Cutting top-rate income tax would be a weak stimulus which undermines the equitable and progressive tax structure we’ll need when the COVID crisis is over.’

Former federal Liberal leader John Hewson said tax cuts will not be good for the Coalition’s electoral hopes in the long run.

HOW MUCH LESS TAX WOULD YOU PAY IF CHANGES ARE BROUGHT FORWARD?
Income  Reduction compared to 2017/18 
$30,000 $255 
$40,000  $580 
$50,000 $1,080 
$60,000  $1,080 
$70,000  $1,080 
$80,000  $1,080 
$90,000  $1,215 
$100,000  $1,665 
$110,000  $2,115 
$120,000+  $2,565 
Source: aph.gov.au   

‘They increase inequality and fail to ensure job security and increasing wages with our economy still struggling to exit recession,’ Dr Hewson said.

The cuts would increase the upper threshold for the 32.5 per cent marginal tax rate from $90,000 to $120,000 and increase the upper threshold for the 19 per cent rate from $41,000 to $45,000.         

In July Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said he was ‘looking at the timing of tax cuts’ because they ‘boost aggregate demand, boost consumption, put more money into people’s pockets.’

Some tax experts believe Mr Frydenberg would get more bang from taxpayers’ bucks by targeting business initiatives.

BDO tax partner Mark Molesworth said personal tax cuts alone will not be enough to drive a worthwhile stimulus response in the face of the first recession since the early 1990s.

‘More Australians are being frugal with their money so a tax cut will not inspire a spending spree even with Christmas approaching,’ Mr Molesworth said on Monday.

‘To encourage consumer spending it would be better to look at business investment incentives.’

These could take the form of an investment allowance, which would provide an incentive to buy assets and expand business operations.

He also suggested an employee headcount rebate, which would be paid as a tax benefit in cash per new full-time employee created by a business.

The federal budget on 6 October will contain a series of measures to get the economy back on track after coronavirus restrictions hammered the economy.

One option being considered is to encourage small and medium businesses to hire new workers by paying a chunk of their wages, government sources told The Australian.

This would be different to the JobKeeper scheme which pays companies to keep existing employees if they suffer a large hit to their revenue.

The government is also tipped to allocate up to $10billion to the states for infrastructure spending. 

The AFR reported the cash could be dished out on a ‘use it or lose it’ basis, meaning states would need to prove they are spending it quickly to qualify for more. 

A spokesman for the Prime Minister told Daily Mail Australia: ‘We’re not engaging in budget speculation.’ 

The $1,500-a-fortnight JobKeeper payments are being reduced to $1,200 from 27 September and to $1,000 from January for full-time workers.

Mr Morrison on Sunday told the ABC that other measures will be introduced to complement the scheme as it is wound back.

The government is reportedly considering wage subsidies to drive hiring. Pictured: An electrician at work

The government is reportedly considering wage subsidies to drive hiring. Pictured: An electrician at work

The government is reportedly considering wage subsidies to drive hiring. Pictured: An electrician at work

‘What Treasury says is that we need to boost aggregate demand in our economy and the full suite of measures you have as a government need to do that job and that’s what the budget will do,’ he said.

‘And so you don’t have to hold on to every measure forever. There are other measures that come in and pick up from where others left off. We are transitioning JobKeeper, it’s important to do that. We always said it was not something that would be around forever.

‘But there are other programs and the Treasurer will go into greater detail about that obviously in the budget, which are dealing with the here and now, but rebuilding our economy and then building it for the future so we can go into a decade of prosperity.’         

The jobless rate unexpectedly fell from 7.5 per cent in July to 6.8 per cent in August, bucking widespread predictions of a slight rise.

Roughly 111,000 people gained employment in August, the third month of exceptionally strong results.

Over half the massive jobs losses in April and May have been recovered.

However such strength masked a 42,400 drop in employment numbers in Victoria, where lockdowns remain.

Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, a Victorian MP, said businesses in the state were still hard hit by lockdowns.

‘I’m hoping and the prime minister is hoping those restrictions can be eased as quickly as it is COVID-safe to do so,’ he said.

Powered by: Daily Mail

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 DiazHub.