Connect with us

Main News

Couple renovating home at breaking point and £40K down after rogue builder leaves it uninhabitable

Published

on

couple renovating home at breaking point and 40k down after rogue builder leaves it uninhabitable

A couple in the midst of renovating their dream family home have been left heartbroken and ‘at breaking point’ after a rogue builder left the property uninhabitable – and them £40,000 out of pocket.

Charlotte Rudolph, 41, from Bath, and her partner Sam Peacock have been living in a social housing rented property for four-and-a-half years and finally purchased their ‘forever home’ – a two-bedroom period terrace – in January this year for £287,500.

Keen to update the 1950s living space to make it more suited to bringing up their children – Ruby, seven, and Dylan, six – the couple enlisted a local builder whom they’d become friends with to help them with the works.

They claim they drew up a contract whereby the builder agreed to do job for a fixed fee of £35,000 – including labour and materials, with them helping out as labourers on site – which later went up to £41,260 to do additional jobs following a loan from Sam’s father.

Charlotte Rudolph, 41, from Bath, and her partner Sam Peacock, pictured with their children Ruby and Dylan, have been left heartbroken and 'at breaking point' after a rogue builder left their dream family home uninhabitable during renovation works - and them £40,000 out of pocket

Charlotte Rudolph, 41, from Bath, and her partner Sam Peacock, pictured with their children Ruby and Dylan, have been left heartbroken and ‘at breaking point’ after a rogue builder left their dream family home uninhabitable during renovation works – and them £40,000 out of pocket

The couple had been living in a social housing rented property for four-and-a-half years and finally purchased their 'forever home' - a two-bedroom terrace - in January this year (pictured) for £287,500

The couple had been living in a social housing rented property for four-and-a-half years and finally purchased their 'forever home' - a two-bedroom terrace - in January this year for £287,500. Pictured now

The couple had been living in a social housing rented property for four-and-a-half years and finally purchased their ‘forever home’ – a two-bedroom terrace – in January this year for £287,500. Pictured before left and right now

But in June, Charlotte says the builder began asking for additional money to cover invoices and an increase in costs of materials during lockdown – which they felt was disproportionate. 

After seeking advice they refused to pay up, which they claim resulted in the builder ignoring their letters and abandoning the job, removing his tools and some of their materials from the site.

To make matters worse, they’ve since been told much of the work done was inadequate and requires rectifying – meaning they need to find an additional £20,000 – £25,000, which they’re trying to raise via a GoFundMe page, before they have to give up their rented accommodation next month.

Speaking to FEMAIL, Charlotte – who is battling chronic kidney disease – said this has been ‘one of the most stressful emotional rollercoaster times of their lives’.

¿ Slide me ¿
Speaking to FEMAIL, Charlotte - who is battling chronic kidney disease - said this has been 'one of the most stressful emotional rollercoaster times of their lives'. Pictured: the living area before and during the works
The living area during the works
Slide me

Speaking to FEMAIL, Charlotte – who is battling chronic kidney disease – said this has been ‘one of the most stressful emotional rollercoaster times of their lives’. Pictured: the living area before and during the works

After they refused to pay the builder more money, they claim he abandoned the job and removed his tools and some of their materials from the site (pictured)

After they refused to pay the builder more money, they claim he abandoned the job and removed his tools and some of their materials from the site (pictured)

‘We are thoroughly ashamed, embarrassed, shocked and hurt. I stupidly trusted this builder, someone who I thought was helping us out, as he knew the troubles we have had with health over the last couple of years,’ she said.

‘We are happy to work our nails to the bone, and use every ounce of energy we have left to get this complete this, we just need a little help to get us over the line.

‘With all the time that the builder has consumed, we are on a very tight deadline as our rent contract deadline is the end of September.’

Charlotte told how the house was meant to be the family’s ‘happy ever after’, after they’ve been plagued by anti-social neighbours at their current rental.

The couple, who were claiming housing benefit, were given 26 weeks to complete renovations after buying their home, which was extended by Bath and North East Somerset council until October. 

The couple were keen to update the 1950s living space to make it more suited to bringing up their children - but it's been left in ruins. Pictured: the kitchen before and now
The kitchen currently
Slide me

The couple were keen to update the 1950s living space to make it more suited to bringing up their children – but it’s been left in ruins. Pictured: the kitchen before and now

Due to some work not being done properly, the couple cannot use the French doors that they bought and partially fitted (pictured) to also allow for the changes required

Due to some work not being done properly, the couple cannot use the French doors that they bought and partially fitted (pictured) to also allow for the changes required

‘The property had not been touched or modernised since the 1950s – this is the only way we could afford to own a house with our budget,’ Charlotte explained.

‘It needed a new roof, a full rewire, some structural work and an overall head-to-toe makeover. 

‘The builder came to review the property before we put an offer in to make sure we could afford the works with our budget. We checked out his rating and reviews on mybuilder.com. At the time he had 100 per cent feedback. It then dropped to 86 per cent after we hired him. 

‘When our issues came to light, we reported our findings to Mybuilder, who have subsequently removed his account from their site.

‘The property is still uninhabitable – it has no electricity, bathroom, kitchen or finished bedrooms and hallways.’

The couple said working alongside the builder six days a week was ‘exhausting but exhilarating’ until his attitude began to change. 

The couple said they will have to shell out an extra £20,000-£25,000 to complete the works, and will need a skip to remove the debris left behind in the garden (pictured before)
The garden is currently a dumping ground
Slide me

The couple said they will have to shell out an extra £20,000-£25,000 to complete the works, and will need a skip to remove the debris left behind (pictured right in the garden)

Charlotte told how the house was meant to be the family's 'happy ever after', after they've been plagued by anti-social neighbours at their current rental

Charlotte told how the house was meant to be the family’s ‘happy ever after’, after they’ve been plagued by anti-social neighbours at their current rental

As well as becoming ‘verbally rude’, careless with their materials, disappearing from site and appearing to cut corners, Charlotte claimed he started asking for more cash. 

‘There were a couple of incidents where he asked for an extra bit of money here and there, but as it was nominal I didn’t put two and two together,’ Charlotte said.

‘On June 27 he sent an invoice for the electrician, asking us to settle it. This, however, was on the agreed works, and was subcontracted out; it essentially was the builder’s responsibility, which he was trying to shift responsibility for. 

‘On July 9 he asked for an additional £1,200 to finish off the conservatory roof, stating that because of Covid-19, the cost of materials had gone up. 

‘I rang some glaziers and they said the price of glass had maybe gone up by two or three per cent, if at all, not the 150 per cent he was charging. 

The property is still uninhabitable - it has no electricity, bathroom (pictured before), kitchen or finished bedrooms and hallways
The bathroom currently
Slide me

The property is still uninhabitable – it has no electricity, bathroom (pictured before and now), kitchen or finished bedrooms and hallways

Charlotte said the tile work on the roof was 'shambolic', with tiles stacking up around windows and the ridge. 'Where titles didn't match up properly, big gaps were formed, simply being filled with red mortar,' she added

Charlotte said the tile work on the roof was ‘shambolic’, with tiles stacking up around windows and the ridge. ‘Where titles didn’t match up properly, big gaps were formed, simply being filled with red mortar,’ she added

‘We also rang other trade merchants who confirmed that none of the materials we had used, or that we still required, were affected by any changes in price. 

‘The next day my partner wanted to discuss with him about any other costs that were meant to be already covered, or were still needing to be covered. They did an itinerary of jobs and works left and the money now needed to finish rose to £5,000.’

Confused by how the project had suddenly ran out of money, the couple contacted Citizen’s Advice and sent a letter to their builder asking him to itemise the outstanding works – but had no response.

‘Following receipt of this letter, he drove up to the site and started removing his tools,’ Charlotte said. 

‘We have just had building control in on July 21, and to add to our woes some of the work he has done will have to be re-done, like the roof, and the configuration of the stairs does not meet fire regulations. 

The roof will need to be redone, as will the configuration of the stairs into the loft space (pictured) which do not meet fire regulations

The roof will need to be redone, as will the configuration of the stairs into the loft space (pictured) which do not meet fire regulations

‘Some walls now need to be removed and others put back up. We also cannot use the French doors that we bought and partially fitted to also allow for the changes required.

‘The electrics need to be completed and completely redone on some floors to comply with fire regulations, the roof leaks and needs to be taken off and completely re-done from scratch. 

‘The tile work was shambolic, with tiles stacking up around windows and the ridge. Where titles didn’t match up properly, big gaps were formed, simply being filled with red mortar.

‘The agreed plaster work has not been started; a few bad messy attempts have been made to make it look as though work has started. The quote we have had to rectify this is around £4,000. 

‘Through a very kind offer of a mum at our kids school, I spoke to a lawyer for advice this morning, and although we have an extremely strong case it’s unlikely that we will see our money, for the unfinished work or the work that has to be re-done.’ 

Charlotte said the agreed plasterwork has not been started, adding: 'A few bad messy attempts have been made to make it look as though work has started. The quote we have had to rectify this is around £4,000.' Pictured: a sitting room before
Messy attempts at plaster work have been made in the sitting room
Slide me

Charlotte said the agreed plaster work has not been started, adding: ‘A few bad messy attempts have been made to make it look as though work has started. The quote we have had to rectify this is around £4,000.’ Pictured: a sitting room before and now

In total, Charlotte said they have paid out £40,508 to the builder in installments, but the house is nowhere near finished.

‘When we knew what was unfolding, I felt winded, sicken, heartbroken and completely disillusioned, like we had nowhere to turn,’ she recalled.

‘Our effort to buy the house and do the work needed – borrowing from multiple people – had taken a lot out of us, but felt worth it. But to then be handed a very different reality just broke us. 

‘We have seriously looked at selling the property in its current state and taking the hit, just to find a conclusion to the situation.’ 

Since sharing their story on GoFundMe, Charlotte said they’ve been ‘humbled’ that a number of tradespeople have offered to help and advise them for free. 

Since sharing their story on GoFundMe, Charlotte said they've been 'humbled' that a number of tradespeople have offered to help and advise them for free. Pictured: Sam helping with the renovations in the living area

Since sharing their story on GoFundMe, Charlotte said they’ve been ‘humbled’ that a number of tradespeople have offered to help and advise them for free. Pictured: Sam helping with the renovations in the living area

‘However, and completely understandably, we would have to provide materials to re-do the roof including the lead flashings that disappeared from site, timber for the stud walls, loft insulation, wood treatment course, gas safety check, paint, banisters and spindles, a skip to remove all of the rubbish left behind – the list goes on,’ she said.

‘The work remaining work – materials and labour – is probably about £25,000 to £30,000. This comprises of remedial work and all outstanding work from the original agreed works lists.

‘We have so far had quotes for the plaster and roof materials, and it’s an eye-watering £8,000 for just these two areas. The electrician bill as well as the structural engineer bills are outstanding – a contract between the builder and these trades.

‘We are dumbfounded with the generous offers of help, so anything contributed will be amazing. We know this is a tough and bizarre time, so can’t thank people enough.

‘I feel a bit ashamed that I find myself cap in hand; I’ve always considered myself proud. But my family are more important than my dignity. We just want a home for our family. 

‘Any surplus funds we would like to donate to people in a similar situation. This is not something we would wish on anyone.’  

Powered by: Daily Mail

Main News

Boris uses national address to warn swingeing fines and more police will enforce loss of freedoms

Published

on

By

boris uses national address to warn swingeing fines and more police will enforce loss of freedoms

‘Six months’ of curbs at a glance

  • All pubs, bars and restaurants in England will be subject to a 10pm curfew from Thursday, with the PM adamant that premises must kick out all of their customers by the cut off point. 
  • The Hospitality sector will also be restricted to table service only as the Government outlawed drinkers making a trip to the bar. 
  • All retail workers and customers in indoor hospitality settings will be required to wear masks  – except when they are seated to eat or drink.
  • All workers who can work from home are now being encouraged to do so from tomorrow. 
  • Fines for breaking the rule of six and for failing to wear a face covering are increasing to £200 for a first offence. 
  • The police will now have the option of asking the military for support with soldiers potentially being drafted in to fulfil office roles and guard protected sites in order to allow officers more time to crackdown on rule-breakers. 
  • The number of people allowed to attend weddings in England is being slashed to 15 from Monday but the number of people allowed to attend a funeral will remain at 30.  
  • Plans for the partial return of sports fans to stadiums on October 1 has been paused.
  • Rule of six exemptions are being tightened to ban indoor team sports like five-a-side-football matches.  
Advertisement

Boris Johnson warned Britons tonight they faced a long hard winter of police-enforced curbs on their freedom to see off coronavirus, saying the alternative was ‘many more families losing loved ones before their time’.

In a televised address to the nation the Prime Minister, flanked by a Union Jack, said he was ‘deeply, spiritually reluctant’ to make new ‘impositions, or infringe anyone’s freedom’ after unveiling new measures in Parliament today.

But he said it was necessary to reintroduce working from home rules and a swathe of social measures in order to avoid a dramatic surge in deaths, overwhelming the NHS and spark a second, economically devastating total lockdown. 

The beleaguered premier faced fire from all sides as he U-turned on his push to reopen workplaces after just a few weeks.

He also faced barbs for introducing other swingeing new measures including a 10pm pub curfew and £200 fines for mask rule-breakers in England in the face of a surge of new coronavirus infections sweeping the country. 

But speaking from Downing Street tonight he warned that ‘iron laws of geometrical progression are shouting at us from the graphs that we risk many more deaths, many more families losing loved ones before their time’.

And he hit out at his critics – including Tory MPs and business leaders who warned of the economic impact of what he is doing, adding: ‘To those who say we don’t need this stuff, and we should leave people to take their own risks, I say these risks are not our own.

‘The tragic reality of having Covid is that your mild cough can be someone else’s death knell.

‘And as for the suggestion that we should simply lock up the elderly and the vulnerable – with all the suffering that would entail – I must tell you that this is just not realistic.

‘Because if you let the virus rip through the rest of the population it would inevitably find its way through to the elderly as well, and in much greater numbers.’

The PM has already warned that the new curbs could last well into 2021, and tonight he warned it could take until then to get mass testing up and running fully and a new vaccine widely available.

He said: ‘Though our doctors and our medical advisers are rightly worried about the data now, and the risks over winter, they are unanimous that things will be far better by the spring, when we have not only the hope of a vaccine, but one day soon – and I must stress that we are not there yet – of mass testing so efficient that people will be able to be tested in minutes so they can do more of the things they love. 

‘That’s the hope; that’s the dream. It’s hard, but it’s attainable, and we are working as hard as we can to get there.’

33494066 8761277 image m 47 1600801394399

In a televised address to the nation the Prime Minister said he was ‘deeply, spiritually reluctant’ to make the changes he unveiled in Parliament today

33444080 8761277 image a 15 1600800830380

33444076 8761277 image a 16 1600800830382

The PM said it was necessary to reintroduce working from home rules and a swathe of social impacts in order to avoid a dramatic surge in deaths and a second, economically devastating total lockdown

The PM said it was necessary to reintroduce working from home rules and a swathe of social impacts in order to avoid a dramatic surge in deaths and a second, economically devastating total lockdown

Public Health England data reveals that of the 729 outbreaks in the week to September 13, only five per cent occurred in food outlets such as restaurants and pubs

Public Health England data reveals that of the 729 outbreaks in the week to September 13, only five per cent occurred in food outlets such as restaurants and pubs

Police blast PM’s ‘absurd’ new rules

Police blasted Boris Johnson’s new coronavirus rules as ‘absurd’ and ‘a nonsense’ tonight as small business owners warned they will go bust if workers stay home again.

The beleaguered Prime Minister faced fire from all sides as he U-turned on his push to reopen workplaces after just a few weeks to tell office staff to work from home if they can.

He also faced barbs for introducing new measures including a 10pm pub curfew and £200 fines for mask rule-breakers among new restrictions on social settings in England.

Mr Johnson warned the curbs may have to be left in place for six months, potentially ruining Christmas and New Year’s Eve, and taking the total time spent under coronavirus restrictions of some kind up to a calendar year.

Chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation Ken Marsh slammed the move as ‘a nonsense’.

He told MailOnline: ‘If someone snitches and says Mr Big has got 20 people in his house, then what are we going to do? Sit outside his house all evening and wait for people to come out and count them or something?

‘That’s one address. We’re talking about millions of addresses. It’s just a nonsense. It’s absolutely absurd.

National chairmanr of the Police Federation of England and Wales John Apter added: ‘More funding for policing this pandemic is much needed. The service needs all the help it can get, as financial pressures on Forces are increasing day-by-day – but today’s announcement lacked any detail. We will wait for that before we celebrate too much.’

 

Advertisement

He continued: ‘Never in our history has our collective destiny and our collective health depended so completely on our individual behaviour. 

‘If we follow these simple rules together, we will get through this winter together. There are unquestionably difficult months to come. And the fight against Covid is by no means over. 

‘I have no doubt, however, that there are great days ahead. But now is the time for us all to summon the discipline, and the resolve, and the spirit of togetherness that will carry us through.’

Mr Johnson had warned the Commons this afternoon that that the curbs may have to be left in place for six months, potentially ruining families Christmases and New Year celebrations, and taking the total time spent under coronavirus restrictions of some kind up to a calendar year. 

The 10pm curfew on the hospitality sector sparked an immediate industry backlash as the UKHospitality group said it was ‘another crushing blow’ 

Chief executive Kate Nicholls said: ‘It is hard to understand how these measures are the solution to fighting the disease when Government data shows that just five per cent of infections out of the home are related to hospitality.’

At the same time Tory MPs warned there must not be another ‘major lockdown’.  They said the decision to ditch the back to work drive will cause widespread ‘dismay’ among workers who live in ‘cramped, overcrowded accommodation’.

They also warned their constituents would be furious at the new crackdown after they followed the Government’s rules only to have seen ‘people at protests, at street parties, not having action taken against them’. 

Meanwhile Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon warned Mr Johnson that his actions did not go far enough as she banned her countrymen from visiting each other in their own homes in a bid to slash to Covid-19 R rate in Scotland. 

Mr Johnson outlined to the public the measures unveiled to MPs this afternoon.

‘And of course I am deeply, spiritually reluctant to make any of these impositions, or infringe anyone’s freedom, but unless we take action the risk is that we will have to go for tougher measures later, when the deaths have already mounted and we have a huge caseload of infection such as we had in the spring,’ he added.

Britain records 4,926 new cases taking the total above 400,000 

Britain today recorded another 4,926 cases of coronavirus, taking the country’s total above 400,000 confirmed infections as the outbreak continues to spiral.

Department of Health figures show 4,189 new Covid-19 infections are now being recorded each day, on average — up 35 per cent from the figure of 3,096 last Tuesday.

But it is impossible to compare cases recorded now to levels seen during the first wave because the government’s lacklustre swabbing policy at the time meant the true scale of the crisis was a mystery. Top experts believe more than 100,000 cases were truly occurring each day during March and April.

Another 37 people have died across the UK, officials announced today, which is more than on any other day for two months. The 44 announced on July 14 was the last highest figure. Government statistics show an average 23 Britons are now succumbing to the illness daily, up from 11 last Tuesday.

Hospital admissions — another measure of how severe an outbreak is — have also risen again. Figures show 237 newly-infected patients required NHS care in England on Sunday, up from 153 the week before. The rolling seven-day average figure has jumped by about 56 per cent over the same time frame.

Separate Office for National Statistics (ONS) data published today showed the weekly number of people dying of Covid-19 rose for the first time since April. Some 99 people in England and Wales were killed by the coronavirus in the week ending September 11, up from 78 a week earlier.

Although still the second lowest number of registered deaths since March and just one per cent of the total deaths from all causes in that the week, the 27 per cent rise shows a reversal of the downward trend that lasted for 20 weeks. Deaths had fallen every week since April 17, three weeks after the lockdown was imposed.

 

Advertisement

‘If we let this virus get out of control now, it would mean that our NHS had no space – once again – to deal with cancer patients and millions of other non-covid medical needs.

‘And if we were forced into a new national lockdown, that would threaten not just jobs and livelihoods but the loving human contact on which we all depend.

‘It would mean renewed loneliness and confinement for the elderly and vulnerable, and ultimately it would threaten once again the education of our children. We must do all we can to avoid going down that road again.

‘But if people don’t follow the rules we have set out, then we must reserve the right to go further. We must take action now because a stitch in time saves nine; and this way we can keep people in work, we can keep our shops and our schools open, and we can keep our country moving forward while we work together to suppress the virus.’

Mr Johnson imposed a 10pm curfew on all restaurants, bars and pubs across England from Thursday with the hospitality sector also being restricted to table service only.

A requirement to wear face coverings will be extended to include retail workers and customers in indoor hospitality settings, except for when they are seated at a table to eat or drink. 

He also announced the end of the Government’s back to work drive as he said he is now ‘asking office workers who can work from home to do so’. 

The Government has been actively encouraging workers to ditch working from home and today’s U-turn represents a humiliating climbdown for the PM who earlier this month had told his Cabinet that ‘people are going back to the office in huge numbers across our country and quite right too’.  

The decision to urge workers to work from home sparked dire warnings about the future of struggling town and city centres as business groups immediately demanded the Government extend its furlough scheme which is due to close at the end of October.   

Mel Stride, the Tory chairman of the Commons Treasury Committee, told the PM that lockdowns ‘destroy jobs and also personal wellbeing’ as he urged the Government to pay attention to the concerns of businesses.

Mr Johnson did not announce a ban on households mixing indoors in England but Nicola Sturgeon this afternoon followed Northern Ireland as she said that from tomorrow Scots will not be able to meet in other people’s homes, prompting questions over which of the home nations has adopted the correct approach. 

Some experts have already warned the PM’s curfew does not go far enough after Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance said yesterday the UK could hit 50,000 cases a day by mid-October and 200 plus daily deaths by November unless Britain changes course. 

Calum Semple, a professor of Child Health and Outbreak Medicine at the University of Liverpool and a member of the Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), said there are ‘several sectors of society which will need to increase their restrictions unfortunately’.  

It was claimed overnight that Mr Johnson had initially backed a total shutdown of the hospitality and leisure sectors before Chancellor Rishi Sunak persuaded him to take a less severe course after warning of economic carnage. 

The unveiling of the new restrictions immediately prompted business concerns amid fears they will inevitably lead to more job losses. 

CBI director general Dame Carolyn Fairbairn told the BBC: ‘It is now desperately urgent to have a successor scheme to the furlough scheme.

‘It has been a huge success. It has saved thousands and thousands of jobs but there is a cliff-edge looming. And, now, with today’s announcement that is more urgent than ever.

‘We are calling for the Treasury to announce a successor scheme very quickly. It should be more targeted. It doesn’t need to be quite as generous. But, if we are going to protect jobs… in the medium-term it needs to be brought in within days or weeks. This is now desperately urgent.’

Ms Fairbairn also said ‘there can be no avoiding the crushing blow’ the new proposals on working from home will bring for firms, particularly those in city centres. 

Boris Johnson’s televised address in full 

Good evening, 

The struggle against Covid is the single biggest crisis the world has faced in my lifetime.

In less than a year this disease has killed almost a million people, and caused havoc to economies everywhere.

Here in the UK we mourn every person we have lost, and we grieve with their families.

And yet I am more certain than ever that this is a struggle that humanity will win, and we in this country will win – and to achieve what we must I want to talk to you directly tonight about the choices that we face – none of them easy – and why we must take action now.

I know that we can succeed because we have succeeded before.

When the sickness took hold in this country in March, we pulled together in a spirit of national sacrifice and community. We followed the guidance to the letter. We stayed at home, protected the NHS, and saved thousands of lives.

And for months with those disciplines of social distancing we have kept that virus at bay.

But we have to acknowledge this this is a great and freedom-loving country; and while the vast majority have complied with the rules there have been too many breaches – too many opportunities for our invisible enemy to slip through undetected.

The virus has started to spread again in an exponential way. Infections are up, hospital admissions are climbing.

We can see what is happening in France and Spain, and we know, alas, that this virus is no less fatal than it was in the spring, and that the vast majority of our people are no less susceptible, and the iron laws of geometrical progression are shouting at us from the graphs that we risk many more deaths, many more families losing loved ones before their time; and I know that faced with that risk the British people will want their government to continue to fight to protect them, you, and that is what we are doing, night and day. And yet the single greatest weapon we bring to this fight is the common sense of the people themselves – the joint resolve of this country to work together to suppress covid now.

So today I set out a package of tougher measures in England – early closing for pubs, bars; table service only; closing businesses that are not Covid secure; expanding the use of face coverings, and new fines for those that fail to comply; and once again asking office workers to work from home if they can while enforcing the rule of six indoors and outdoors – a tougher package of national measures combined with the potential for tougher local restrictions for areas already in lockdown.

I know that this approach – robust but proportionate – already carries the support of all the main parties in parliament.

After discussion with colleagues in the Devolved Administrations, I believe this broad approach is shared across the whole UK. And to those who say we don’t need this stuff, and we should leave people to take their own risks, I say these risks are not our own.

The tragic reality of having Covid is that your mild cough can be someone else’s death knell.

And as for the suggestion that we should simply lock up the elderly and the vulnerable – with all the suffering that would entail – I must tell you that this is just not realistic, because if you let the virus rip through the rest of the population it would inevitably find its way through to the elderly as well, and in much greater numbers.

That’s why we need to suppress the virus now, and as for that minority who may continue to flout the rules, we will enforce those rules with tougher penalties and fines of up to £10,000. We will put more police out on the streets and use the army to back-fill if necessary.

And of course I am deeply, spiritually reluctant to make any of these impositions, or infringe anyone’s freedom, but unless we take action the risk is that we will have to go for tougher measures later, when the deaths have already mounted and we have a huge caseload of infection such as we had in the spring.

If we let this virus get out of control now, it would mean that our NHS had no space – once again – to deal with cancer patients and millions of other non-Covid medical needs.

And if we were forced into a new national lockdown, that would threaten not just jobs and livelihoods but the loving human contact on which we all depend.

It would mean renewed loneliness and confinement for the elderly and vulnerable, and ultimately it would threaten once again the education of our children. We must do all we can to avoid going down that road again.

But if people don’t follow the rules we have set out, then we must reserve the right to go further. We must take action now because a stitch in time saves nine; and this way we can keep people in work, we can keep our shops and our schools open, and we can keep our country moving forward while we work together to suppress the virus.

That is our strategy, and if we can follow this package together, then I know we can succeed because in so many ways we are better prepared than before.

We have the PPE, we have the beds, we have the Nightingales, we have new medicines – pioneered in this country – that can help save lives.

And though our doctors and our medical advisers are rightly worried about the data now, and the risks over winter, they are unanimous that things will be far better by the spring, when we have not only the hope of a vaccine, but one day soon – and I must stress that we are not there yet – of mass testing so efficient that people will be able to be tested in minutes so they can do more of the things they love. That’s the hope; that’s the dream. It’s hard, but it’s attainable, and we are working as hard as we can to get there.

But until we do, we must rely on our willingness to look out for each other, to protect each other. Never in our history has our collective destiny and our collective health depended so completely on our individual behaviour.

If we follow these simple rules together, we will get through this winter together. There are unquestionably difficult months to come.

And the fight against Covid is by no means over. I have no doubt, however, that there are great days ahead.

But now is the time for us all to summon the discipline, and the resolve, and the spirit of togetherness that will carry us through. 

Advertisement

 

Those new rules in full that will wipe out Christmas and New Year: Working from home is back, facemasks in pubs and restaurants – and will hairdressers and gyms be included in the Rule of Six?

Boris Johnson apologetically took a hammer to Britons’ social lives today as he reintroduced lockdown measures in England to last possibly six months to see off a second wave of coronavirus.

Pubs and other leisure and hospitality businesses like restaurants will face a 10pm curfew from Thursday.

People working in retail, those travelling in taxis, and staff and customers in indoor hospitality will also have to wear face coverings – except while seated at a table to eat or drink.

And in a dramatic reversal of the Government’s recent drive to get people back to workplaces, all office workers will be advised to work from home where they can as soon as possible. 

In a grave Commons statement the Prime Minister warned that the new curbs could last for six months – taking them well beyond Christmas – ‘unless we palpably make progress’. 

Here we look at the new rules that have been unveiled today: 

PUBS AND RESTAURANTS

ENGLAND — 

From this Thursday, pubs and restaurants will have to close at 10pm. This means last orders will have to take place some time after 9pm.

Customers will not be allowed to order drinks at the bar. All pubs and bars must become table service only, like restaurants.

This is a change from the current rules, where standing at the bar for a pint was allowed as long as there was social distancing in place.

It also applies to takeaway services, many of which sustained businesses through the worst of the original lockdown.

But food (and drink) deliveries are allowed to continue after 10am because it is easier to limit human contact.

In a grave Commons statement the Prime Minister warned that the new curbs could last for six months - taking them well beyond Christmas - 'unless we palpably make progress'

In a grave Commons statement the Prime Minister warned that the new curbs could last for six months – taking them well beyond Christmas – ‘unless we palpably make progress’

WALES, SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN IRELAND —

The same rules for England are expected to apply in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. The devolved administrations will announce their plans this week.

IS THE 10PM CURFEW ECONOMICALLY DAMAGING?

The Prime Minister told the Commons ‘the spread of the disease does tend to happen later at night after more alcohol has been consumed’.

In reply to Meg Hillier, Labour chairwoman of the Commons Public Accounts Committee he said: ‘These are not easy decisions, nobody wants to be curtailing the right of restaurants and other businesses to go about their lawful business.

‘What we have seen from the evidence is that alas the spread of the disease does tend to happen later at night after more alcohol has been consumed.

‘This is one way that we see of driving down the R without doing excessive economic damage and that’s the balance we have to strike.’

Ministers have been warned that a 10pm curfew on pubs and restaurants will be the ‘final nail in the coffin’ for many businesses still treading water after the first wave of Covid-19.

Exasperated hospitality bosses are fuming that they are bearing the brunt of Boris Johnson’s coronavirus crackdown when Government figures show a comparably low spread of the disease in food and drink outlets.

Public Health England data reveals that of the 729 outbreaks in the week to September 13, only five per cent occurred in food outlets such as restaurants and pubs – 45 per cent were in care homes, 21 per cent in schools and 18 per cent in places of work.

People sit in a restaurant in Covent Garden in London today as the PM clobbered civil liberties

People sit in a restaurant in Covent Garden in London today as the PM clobbered civil liberties

Pubs like the French House in Soho, central London, will have to close at 10pm. That is not last orders at 10pm, that is close at 10pm.

Pubs like the French House in Soho, central London, will have to close at 10pm. That is not last orders at 10pm, that is close at 10pm.

Wetherspoons founder Tim Martin said: ‘The curfew doesn’t even stand up to five minutes consideration by an intelligent person because if you look at the stats… there are relatively few transfers of infections in pubs.’

The Government faced renewed calls to do more to support businesses, with the hospitality industry warning that the new restrictions would be a ‘crushing blow’.

Kate Nicholls, chief executive of trade body UKHospitality, said: ‘It is hard to understand how these measures are the solution to fighting the disease when Government data shows that just 5 per cent of infections out of the home are related to hospitality.’

Michael Kill, chief executive of the Night Time Industries Association, warned the measures could trigger ‘a surge of unregulated events and house parties which are the real hot-beds of infection, attended by frustrated young people denied access to safe and legitimate night-time hospitality venues’.

Up to 6,000 jobs are being axed at Premier Inn owner Whitbread, which also operates the Beefeater pubs and Brewers Fayre chains.

The Wetherspoon pub chain also said it had written to its 1,000 airport staff to warn them that between 400 and 450 jobs are at risk of redundancy.

Officer workers have been told to work from home 'if possible' although those in 'key public services and in all professions' where this is not possible, such as construction and retail, should continue to go in

Officer workers have been told to work from home ‘if possible’ although those in ‘key public services and in all professions’ where this is not possible, such as construction and retail, should continue to go in

33435694 8761277 image a 24 1600800830389

33435696 8761277 image a 25 1600800830390

WORKING FROM HOME

Officer workers have been told to work from home ‘if possible’, although those in ‘key public services and in all professions’ where this is not possible, such as construction and retail, should continue to go in.

According to Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove: ‘We are stressing that if it is safe to work in your workplace, if you are in a Covid-secure workplace, then you should be there if your job requires it.

‘But, if you can work from home you should.’

There is also confusion about who decides what is ‘possible’, which is likely to be a flashpoint between employers and staff going forward. 

The new message brings England into line with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, which have all advised people to work from home wherever possible throughout the pandemic.

If businesses are not Covid-secure, flout the mask regulations or break the Rule of Six, they will be fined £10,000 or closed down.

If people prevent others from self-isolating – such as bosses threatening redundancy – they can also be fined.

FACEMASKS

Face masks must be worn by customers in indoor hospitality and leisure venues, except while seated at a table to eat or drink.

Coverings must also be worn in taxis and private hire vehicles from tomorrow, and by retail staff at work — though most had already brought in this requirement anyway.

For people who do not wear face coverings, and who are not exempt, in places legally stated there are fines of £200 in England, or £60 in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales.

The Prime Minister has also announced tougher enforcement measures, with businesses facing fines or closure for failing to comply with coronavirus rules, meaning there will be consequences for pubs that try to serve you at the bar.

Commuters walk across the London Bridge during the morning rush hour in September

Commuters walk across the London Bridge during the morning rush hour in September

A man enjoys a a drink at The Kings Ford pub in Chingford, East London, as the PM made his announcement in the Commons this afternoon

A man enjoys a a drink at The Kings Ford pub in Chingford, East London, as the PM made his announcement in the Commons this afternoon

National Police Chiefs’ Council chairman Martin Hewitt said: ‘Individuals, businesses and households all have a responsibility to ensure the virus is suppressed and police will play their part in supporting the public to navigate the measures in place for our safety.

‘Our approach of engaging with people and explaining the regulations in place will remain. The vast majority of situations are resolved following those two stages, with little need for further encouragement or enforcement action to be taken,’ he said.

‘Police will continue to work with their communities and only issue fines as a last resort.

‘Chiefs will be stepping up patrols in high-risk areas and will proactively work with businesses, licensing authorities and local authorities to ensure the rules are being followed.

‘If members of the public are concerned that the law is being broken or they are experiencing anti-social behaviour, they can report this to the police, who will consider the most appropriate response and will target the most problematic behaviour.’

RULE OF SIX AND SELF-ISOLATION

In England, a maximum of six people from multiple households can meet up both indoors and outdoors — in private homes, pubs, restaurants and parks. 

All ages are included in the headcount. There are some exceptions — for example, when a single household has more than six occupants.

The Rule of Six has been extended to take in ‘leisure, entertainment, tourism and close contact’ sectors’. The latter includes hairdressers and other beauty treatments.

More details are awaited on what else specifically it will mean for places like gyms, although Mr Johnson today banned indoor group sports like five-a-side football.

So it means that currently hairdressers, nail bars and beauty salons can still operate, but they will need to cut still further the number of people they can serve at any one time. 

Anyone who breaks the rules on social gatherings in England will be fined £200 with the penalty doubling on each further repeat offence up to £3,200.

Businesses that break the Rule of Six will be fined £10,000 or closed down.

Further guidance is expected on the specifics of this but has yet to be published by the Government.

People with coronavirus symptoms who do not self-isolate will face fines of £1,000, rising to £10,000 for repeat offences from September 28.

SCHOOLS

Schools will remain unaffected by the new restrictions. Along with protecting the economy, one of the main thrusts of today’s announcements is the Government’s desire to prioritise keeping schools open.

Mr Johnson said: ‘I want to stress that this is by no means a return to the full lockdown of March. We are not issuing a general instruction to stay at home.

‘We will ensure that schools, colleges and universities stay open – because nothing is more important than the education, health and well-being of our young people. We will ensure that businesses can stay open in a Covid-compliant way.’

WEDDINGS AND FUNERALS

From next Monday, wedding ceremonies and receptions in England have to be capped at 15 people — down from 30 people.

But funeral services are exempt from the new restrictions, with the maximum number of mourners remaining at 30.

Celebrations held this weekend will narrowly avoid the new restrictions.

Setting out the measures in the House of Commons, Mr Johnson said: ‘Fifth, now is the time to tighten up the Rule of Six.

‘I’m afraid that from Monday a maximum of 15 people will be able to attend wedding ceremonies and receptions, though up to 30 can still attend a funeral as now.’

From next Monday, wedding ceremonies and receptions in England have to be capped at 15 people — down from 30 people. But funeral services are exempt from the new restrictions, with the maximum number of mourners remaining at 30

From next Monday, wedding ceremonies and receptions in England have to be capped at 15 people — down from 30 people. But funeral services are exempt from the new restrictions, with the maximum number of mourners remaining at 30

Current guidance states that up to 30 attendees are permitted in Wales, while in Scotland, ceremonies and receptions are limited to 20 people, and numbers are dependent on the venue in Northern Ireland.

One bride, due to get married on December 12 after being engaged for five years, who had originally planned a wedding with 100 people in Norfolk, said she felt ‘gutted’ following the announcement.

‘We are then seeing people say online that it doesn’t matter, it’s not important and at least we don’t have Covid and then we feel like our feelings are not valid,’ 40-year-old Laura Brown told the PA news agency.

‘It’s a day but it’s so much more than a day, because of all the emotions that go into it.’

Meanwhile, self-employed wedding celebrant Chris Gray, from Glasgow, called the restrictions around weddings ‘nonsensical’, such as couples being required to wear coverings during the ceremony.

The 29-year-old added: ‘That’s led so many people having to cancel or rearrange weddings and in the short-term it’s been an absolute hammer blow for cash flow for me.’

OTHER PUBLIC SPACES

SPORTS MATCHES

In England, a maximum of six people can take part in indoor team sports. However, large sports events and conferences will not take place from October 1, as previously planned.

Mr Johnson announced that the planned return of spectators to sports venues in England could be on hold for six months, raising the prospect of months more of games behind closed doors.

A number of pilot test events, in which capacities have been capped at 1,000, have taken place and it was hoped venues would be allowed to welcome more spectators from the start of October.

In England, a maximum of six people can take part in indoor team sports. However, large sports events and conferences will not take place from October 1, as previously planned

In England, a maximum of six people can take part in indoor team sports. However, large sports events and conferences will not take place from October 1, as previously planned

In England, a maximum of six people can take part in indoor team sports. However, large sports events and conferences will not take place from October 1, as previously planned

In England, a maximum of six people can take part in indoor team sports. However, large sports events and conferences will not take place from October 1, as previously planned

But the PM set out a range of tough new restrictions for England designed to limit the spread of Covid-19.

‘We have to acknowledge that the spread of the virus is now affecting our ability to reopen business conferences, exhibitions and large sporting events,’ he told the House of Commons.

‘So we will not be able to do this from October 1 and I recognise the implications for our sports clubs which are the life and soul of our communities, and… the Chancellor and the Culture Secretary are working urgently on what we can do now to support them.’

He said the measures being announced on Tuesday would remain in place for ‘perhaps six months’.

It is a devastating blow to sporting organisations, many of whom rely heavily on match-day revenue for survival, and there have already been calls from governing bodies for the government to provide emergency funding.

Professional sport, including the Premier League and Test cricket, has largely been played behind closed doors since it returned following the coronavirus shutdown earlier this year.

The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport confirmed all pilot events scheduled for September had now been cancelled. They will now take place with no fans.

In a statement this afternoon, the Premier League said fans would be ‘as safe or even safer than at any other public activity currently permitted’.

‘The Premier League notes the Government’s announcement today and while the health of the nation must remain everyone’s priority, we are disappointed that the safe return of supporters to matches has been postponed,’ it said.

‘The Premier League is certain that, through League-wide guidelines and a code of conduct developed with scientific experts and agreed by the Government’s Sports Ground Safety Authority, fans in stadiums will be as safe or even safer than at any other public activity currently permitted. This is already evident in other European leagues.’ 

How long will the new restrictions be in place for? 

The new restrictions brought in today could last for six months – but Mr Johnson has insisted they are not a return to the national lockdown seen in March. 

He said: ‘For the time being, this virus is a fact of our lives and I must tell the House and the country that our fight against it will continue. 

‘We will not listen to those who say let the virus rip, nor those who urge a permanent lockdown. We are taking decisive and appropriate steps to balance saving lives with protecting jobs and livelihoods.’ 

Many families will be anxious for Christmas after hearing the new rules – but ministers have insisted they do not want to ruin the holiday season. 

The five days of panic which paved the way for Boris Johnson to impose a curfew on pubs

Thursday: The latest official data presented to ministers showed that coronavirus cases were on the rise in all age groups while hospitalisations were also increasing across the board. The numbers are said to have prompted Michael Gove to call for decisive action to be taken. 

By the end of the day a ‘consensus’ had reportedly emerged around a plan for a total shutdown of the hospitality and leisure sectors, with Mr Gove and Health Secretary Matt Hancock said to be the leading advocates. 

Advisers on the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies also backed the plans on the grounds that it was not possible to predict the impact of a less severe curfew on pubs, bars and restaurants. 

Mr Johnson was reportedly initially in favour of the total shutdown. 

Friday: The prospect of a total shutdown spooked ministers and officials in the Treasury and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy who were afraid of the damage such a move would do to the economy. 

Chancellor Rishi Sunak is said to have asked to see the Prime Minister and the pair then met on Friday afternoon. Mr Sunak spelled out his fears in person and Mr Johnson was apparently sympathetic to the message from the Chancellor, asking officials to look at other options. 

Saturday and Sunday: Mr Johnson held further talks with senior ministers as well as with Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance and Chief Medical Officer Professor Chris Whitty as the premier tried to hammer out an agreed way forward. Mr Johnson eventually decided to go ahead with a curfew plan instead of a total shutdown as the ‘hawks’ in the Cabinet appeared to win the battle with the ‘doves’.

Monday: The PM’s latest lockdown plans were formally decided upon by senior ministers ahead of a formal announcement today.

Advertisement

Powered by: Daily Mail

Continue Reading

Main News

Prince Carl Philip of Sweden dons his military uniform as he visits a marine regiment in Berga

Published

on

By

prince carl philip of sweden dons his military uniform as he visits a marine regiment in berga

Prince Carl Philip of Sweden donned his military uniform today when visiting a marine regiment in Berga.

The royal, 41, a former Major in the Swedish Navy, sported a green camouflage jacket and matching trousers for his solo outing, with the father-of-two appearing without his wife Princess Sofia.

He toured the 1st Marine Regiment and the 4th Naval Warfare Flotilla in Berga, Sweden, speaking with officers and crew members.

Prince Carl Philip of Sweden (pictured) donned his military uniform today when visiting a marine regiment in Berga

Prince Carl Philip of Sweden (pictured) donned his military uniform today when visiting a marine regiment in Berga

The royal (pictured), 41, a former Major in the Swedish Navy, sported a green camouflage jacket and matching trousers for his solo outing

The father-of-two (pictured) appeared without his wife Princess Sofia

The royal (pictured), 41, a former Major in the Swedish Navy, sported a green camouflage jacket and matching trousers for his solo outing, with the father-of-two appearing without his wife Princess Sofia

The prince was taken around the surrounding woodland and even shown some of the machinery used by the groups.

Wearing black boots fit for the occasion, the royal appeared to mean business as he walked across the grounds with a military hat covering his locks.

The 1st Marine Regiment forms a vital link between Sweden’s naval and army forces, according to its website.

The royal (pictured left) toured the 1st Marine Regiment and the 4th Naval Warfare Flotilla in Berga, Sweden, speaking with officers

The royal (pictured left) toured the 1st Marine Regiment and the 4th Naval Warfare Flotilla in Berga, Sweden, speaking with officers

Prince Carl Philip pictured visiting with Captain Lundvall at the 4th Naval Warfare Flotilla in Berga, earlier today

Prince Carl Philip pictured visiting with Captain Lundvall at the 4th Naval Warfare Flotilla in Berga, earlier today

The prince poses up a storm during his outing

The prince (pictured) was taken around the surrounding woodland and even shown some of the machinery used by the groups

The prince (pictured) was taken around the surrounding woodland and even shown some of the machinery used by the groups

‘The regiment’s coastal rangers and naval personnel have a variety of advanced, highly mobile weapon systems giving them the capability to control coastal areas effectively,’ it added.

Meanwhile, the 4th Naval Warfare Flotilla is tasked with a variety of roles including submarine hunting and naval and airspace surveillance.

Known as Sweden’s real-life Prince Charming, Carl Philip broke the hearts of royal-watchers across the globe when he announced his engagement to former reality TV star Sofia Hellqvist in 2014, four years after news of their relationship first hit headlines.

Wearing black boots fit for the occasion, the royal (pictured right) appeared to mean business as he walked across the grounds with a military hat covering his locks

Wearing black boots fit for the occasion, the royal (pictured right) appeared to mean business as he walked across the grounds with a military hat covering his locks

The 1st Marine Regiment forms a vital link between Sweden's naval and army forces, according to its website. Pictured, Prince Carl Philip visits Captain Lundvall

The 1st Marine Regiment forms a vital link between Sweden’s naval and army forces, according to its website. Pictured, Prince Carl Philip visits Captain Lundvall

Meanwhile, the 4th Naval Warfare Flotilla (pictured with the royal) is tasked with a variety of roles including submarine hunting and naval and airspace surveillance

Meanwhile, the 4th Naval Warfare Flotilla (pictured with the royal) is tasked with a variety of roles including submarine hunting and naval and airspace surveillance

The couple welcomed their first son, Prince Alexander, in April 2016 and another little boy, Prince Gabriel, arrived in August the following year.

The prince is the only son of the King and Queen of Sweden and is fourth-in-line to the throne.

In 1980 a law was passed which gave his older sister Victoria precedence in the line of succession.

The royal’s visit comes after his wife Princess Sofia of Sweden said she would never want a version of ‘Megxit’ to happen within her royal family – stating she has ‘found such a fantastic balance’. 

Known as Sweden's real-life Prince Charming, Carl Philip (pictured left) broke the hearts of royal-watchers across the globe when he announced his engagement to former reality TV star Sofia Hellqvist in 2014, four years after news of their relationship first hit headlines

Known as Sweden’s real-life Prince Charming, Carl Philip (pictured left) broke the hearts of royal-watchers across the globe when he announced his engagement to former reality TV star Sofia Hellqvist in 2014, four years after news of their relationship first hit headlines

The prince (pictured right, during his outing) is the only son of the King and Queen of Sweden and is fourth-in-line to the throne

The prince (pictured right, during his outing) is the only son of the King and Queen of Sweden and is fourth-in-line to the throne

The 35-year-old royal shared her thoughts in a documentary titled Princess Sofia: Project Playground which aired on Swedish channel TV4. 

According to Royal Central, when asked about whether she would ever consider following the lead of the Duke, 35, and Duchess of Sussex, 39, the former model said: ‘No. Not really. I think I have found such a fantastic balance, and I really see it as a positive that I have made it through these stormy years. 

‘It is such a huge advantage, in that we have the opportunity to stand a little in both worlds.’  

Princess Sofia has much in common with Meghan with neither having any royal connections when they met their princes – Harry and Carl Philip – and leaving behind the showbiz world for a rather more sedate life. 

Powered by: Daily Mail

Continue Reading

Main News

Britain’s Got Talent contestant who worked as Superdrug security guard wins £11,000 sexism payout

Published

on

By

britains got talent contestant who worked as superdrug security guard wins 11000 sexism payout

A Britain’s Got Talent contestant has won almost £11,000 in a sexism claim after her ‘patronising’ boss kept calling her ‘honey’. 

Peta Jessemey, 43, a security guard who worked at Superdrug stores, was ‘bullied and belittled’ by manager Rod Tolmie, who singled her out because of her gender. 

Mr Tolmie, a former Royal Military Police Officer, reduced her hours ‘because she was a woman’ and repeatedly talked over because he ‘had less regard to what women had to say’. 

A judge criticised Mr Tolmie for having a ‘negative attitude’ towards female security officers and believing that they were more ‘vulnerable’ than male guards. 

An employment tribunal heard that when Miss Jessemey – a singer who made it to the live auditions in the hit ITV show in 2011 – was assaulted at work, he made a ‘disdainful’ comment about female security guards. 

Peta Jessemey (pictured), 43, a security guard who worked at Superdrug stores, was 'bullied and belittled' by manager Rod Tolmie, who singled her out because of her gender

Peta Jessemey (pictured), 43, a security guard who worked at Superdrug stores, was ‘bullied and belittled’ by manager Rod Tolmie, who singled her out because of her gender

Mr Tolmie repeatedly asked her if she thought a male guard would be better suited. 

He even made visits to stores she worked at to try to convince their managers that they would be better off without her. 

Mr Tolmie ‘demeaned and degraded’ her by calling her ‘honey’ – but tried to blame it being ‘from Northern Ireland and ex-military police’. 

Miss Jessemey was forced to resign from the job she loved and launched legal action against Lodge Services, a security firm which provides guards to retailers including Superdrug. 

She has now won £10,906 after a judge ruled she was harassed and discriminated against on grounds of sex. 

She worked at Superdrug stores in Colchester and Clacton, both Essex, and Ipswich, Suffolk, from 2012 to 2014, while Mr Tolmie was her area manager and in charge of 100 staff.

Miss Jessemey no longer works for Lodge Services and has a different job as a security officer.  

At the tribunal in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, Miss Jessemey claimed he blocked her having a pay rise and threatened her with police action when she asked about travel pay.  

A tribunal report outlined some of the alleged incidents she experienced. It said: ‘On January 10, 2013, Miss Jessemey was assaulted at work.

‘Mr Tolmie made a public comment along the lines of ‘another female officer was assaulted recently’.

‘Miss Jessemey says and we accept, that Mr Tolmie was disdainful when saying this, as if her gender was therefore significant. Mr Tolmie asked Miss Jessemey if a male guard would be better suited to the store in question.

‘On June 6, 2014, Miss Jessemey was assaulted again at work. This resulted in her finishing work very late, attending the police station the following morning and therefore being late to start her shift.

‘Mr Tolmie was angry with her for being late. Miss Jessemey was not paid in full for her late hours and her time at the police station. She worked three hours overtime and was only paid for one hour.’

It added: ‘[Miss Jessemey] had been informed by clients that Mr Tolmie had been visiting stores without listing his attendance by signing in and out, so that his attendance could not be traced.

‘He had endeavoured during these visits to convince the staff in those stores that they would be better off without her.’

Miss Jessemey was forced to resign from the job she loved and launched legal action against Lodge Services, a security firm which provides guards to retailers including Superdrug (file photo)

Miss Jessemey was forced to resign from the job she loved and launched legal action against Lodge Services, a security firm which provides guards to retailers including Superdrug (file photo)

During a performance review, it was claimed Mr Tolmie said she ‘wasn’t worth much to him and so would not be getting an increase in pay; told her she would not be any good at training and that he would not bother wasting his money with her on CCTV or First Aid training’.  

Employment Judge Martin Warren said: ‘Mr Tolmie’s behaviour towards her could accurately be described as bullying and belittling.

‘Addressing women as ‘honey’ is patronising, demeaning and degrading. Mr Tolmie did not address men as ‘honey’. 

‘All the instances of talking over others in the evidence, albeit much of that hearsay, are in relation to conversations with women.

‘Mr Tolmie’s tendency was to talk over women and have less regard to what they had to say.

‘Repeatedly questioning whether a male security guard is to be preferred is related to gender.

‘It was clear from Mr Tolmie’s evidence, cutting through some of his very long and rambling answers, that his attitude was that female security officers, be they store detectives or security guards, were more vulnerable than their male colleagues.’

The judge added: ‘Mr Tolmie’s explanation for using the term ‘honey’ is that he is from Northern Ireland and ex-military police.

‘Neither of those are an excuse, or an acceptable one.

‘Mr Tolmie’s explanation for querying whether or not a male security guard would be better was rambling and evasive. It left us with the impression that he had a negative attitude toward women working in security.’

Miss Jessemey, who lives near Ipswich and is now a security officer, won claims of unfair dismissal, harassment and direct sex discrimination against Lodge Services.

Speaking after the tribunal, Miss Jessemey, who still sings, told how she faced multiple setbacks with the tribunal process but finally won.

She also said: ‘I am glad that I won. I know I was not the only person to be treated this way and felt that I had to speak out.’

Superdrug told MailOnline in a statement: ‘We are aware of the recent settlement between the external security provider, Lodge Services, and a security guard who was employed by this third party supplier.

‘Superdrug has not worked with Lodge services since 2016.’ 

Powered by: Daily Mail

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 DiazHub.