Connect with us

Main News

Ministers accused of ‘losing control’ of immigration as cash handouts act as ‘no lose pull factor’

Published

on

ministers accused of losing control of immigration as cash handouts act as no lose pull factor

The Government has been accused of ‘losing control’ of illegal immigration, with an asylum policy which is a ‘no lose’ situation for those who manage to reach Britain.

A think-tank which campaigns for tougher border controls called for a review of the amounts paid to asylum seekers by the taxpayer, suggesting they are a ‘pull factor’ which attract illegal entrants.

Migration Watch UK, in a report published today, also said only a tiny minority of those who arrived illegally by boat have been removed since Prime Minister Boris Johnson warned last August: ‘We will send you back.’

More than 5,466 have arrived since the start of September, it said.

But only 3 per cent, or 169 people, have been removed under European Union rules which state migrants must claim refugee status in the first safe country they reach.

A migrant boat arrived on the Channel coast this morning in a rigid inflatable boat close to the Port of Dover, the 11th day running people have arrived in Kent. Those in it were arrested by local police.

31945016 0 image m 42 1597403005178

A migrant boat arrived on the Channel coast this morning in a rigid inflatable boat close to the Port of Dover. Those in it were arrested by local police

A migrant boat arrived on the Channel coast this morning in a rigid inflatable boat close to the Port of Dover. Those in it were arrested by local police

The pressure group also noted the UK took three times as many asylum seekers from other EU states as it sent back – 2,390 came here between 2017 and 2019, while just 786 were returned.

A spokesman for the group added: ‘For many illegal entrants, getting to the UK is a no-lose option.’

Alp Mehmet, the think-tank’s chairman, said: ‘The Government have lost control of illegal immigration across the Channel.

‘As well as deterring people from setting out, they must address the pull factors.

‘A major review is essential, including revision of the law on payments to asylum seekers.’

Its report highlighted the £39.60 a week that is paid by the Home Office to each asylum seeker, many of whom are also entitled to free accommodation.

It said official figures from the National Audit Office suggested there are a total of 150,000 asylum seekers in the UK.

Yesterday THU migrants in lifejackets and masks were brought into the Port of Dover aboard a Border Force patrol boat before being taken ashore by officials.

It was the tenth consecutive day of arrivals – a record – including a daily high of 235 on Thursday last week.

The Government has asked for military assistance, which so far has taken the form of two RAF surveillance planes, but proposals to send armed forces to the Channel to deal with small boat crossings have come under fire from France.

Calais mayor Natacha Bouchart said earlier this week that sending the Royal Navy into the Channel would be a ‘declaration of maritime war’.

One Conservative MP retaliated by suggesting Britain should invade Calais.

Sir Edward Leigh MP – who has represented Gainsborough, Kent since 1983 – yesterday/on Wednesday tweeted: ‘Problems with cross-Channel migrants?

‘We should never have lost Calais in 1558. Why not take it back?

‘On second thoughts, cheaper to pay the French a few million to stop them on the beaches.’

The Home Secretary Priti Patel has told Tory MPs that the asylum system is ‘broken’ as she promised to introduce laws that would ‘send the left into meltdown’.

In a briefing to backbenchers, Miss Patel said the system was being ‘exploited by leftie Labour-supporting lawyers’ who were doing everything they could to stop the Government removing people.

New laws – with the provisional title of the Fair Borders Bill – is expected early next year.

The Home Secretary Priti Patel has told Tory MPs that the asylum system is 'broken' as she promised to introduce laws that would 'send the left into meltdown'

The Home Secretary Priti Patel has told Tory MPs that the asylum system is ‘broken’ as she promised to introduce laws that would ‘send the left into meltdown’

The Mail revealed in May that it will include measures forcing failed asylum seekers to lodge all their grounds for appeal at the beginning of a case, rather than being able to drip-feed new elements of a claim in order to delay a final ruling and avoid removal from the UK.

It is understood the Bill could also contain other new immigration measures which will depend on the results of Brexit negotiations and separate talks with France, which opened this week.

Numbers arriving yesterday THU are yet to be confirmed but 71 migrants came on six boats on Wednesday.

Miss Patel’s newly appointed Clandestine Channel Threat Commander, former Royal Marine Dan O’Mahoney, said: ‘These crossings are dangerous and unnecessary and I am determined to stop them.

‘The minister and I met with French officials in Paris on Tuesday for discussions on how to advance joint working on making the small boats route for illegal migration unviable.

‘We will continue to go after the heinous criminals and organised crime networks putting people’s lives at risk.’

Powered by: Daily Mail

Main News

Experts provoke storm in a teacup by saying you should NEVER use boiling water to make tea 

Published

on

By

experts provoke storm in a teacup by saying you should never use boiling water to make tea

Hard day at work? There’s nothing like a reviving cuppa.

So put the kettle on, let the water boil, get ready to brew up… and stop! Don’t pour just yet.

New advice suggests using boiling water to make tea is a ‘myth’ which leaves it tasting ‘no better than cabbage water’.

Although it may cause traditionalists to turn a milky shade of white, experts have claimed the best way to make our national drink is to let the water cool down to 80 degrees.

The storm in a teacup was provoked by Martin Isark, a professional food and drink taster, who says boiling a kettle for tea was a relic of the past when it was needed to make sure the water was safe.

‘It’s time to debunk the myth that you should use boiling water,’ he said. ‘Having the water too hot will kill the desirable nuances of tea and all you are left with is a strong flavour of dry, astringent tannins. Overboiling your water and dunking teabags too long leaves tea tasting no better than cabbage water.’

The news could come as a shock to a character like Mrs Doyle, the tea-obsessed housekeeper in the Channel 4 sitcom Father Ted

The news could come as a shock to a character like Mrs Doyle, the tea-obsessed housekeeper in the Channel 4 sitcom Father Ted

The news could come as a shock to a character like Mrs Doyle, the tea-obsessed housekeeper in the Channel 4 sitcom Father Ted. In fact, for those without temperature-controlled kettles Mr Isark even suggests adding cold water on top of the tea bag before pouring the kettle, with milk and sugar going in last. 

He claims that boiling water cools down by roughly ten degrees for every 10 per cent of cold water added so to hit the 80 degree sweet spot the mug needs to be 20 per cent cold water.

Edward Eisler, a ‘tea master’ and founder of Jing Tea, agrees. He said: ‘It is simply not true that you need boiling water to make a cup of tea. Many teas taste better when made with cooler water.’

As a guide, breakfast tea and Assam should be made with water at 80 degrees, whereas Green tea is best at 50-65 degrees and Oolong at anything up to 95 degrees.

There are now several kettles on the market with variable temperature settings that allow users decide exactly how hot they want their water to be. Models include the Smeg KLF04, Sage Smart and Bosch Sky kettles.

Britons recoiled in horror in June when a video of an American woman making ‘hot tea’ went viral. In it, she microwaved a mug of cold water for a minute, filled a third of it with milk before adding the teabag and an overly-generous amount of sugar. 

It prompted Dame Karen Pierce, Britain’s ambassador to the US, to film her own riposte in which her ‘military advisers’ demonstrated how to make tea properly.

This post first appeared on dailymail.co.uk

Continue Reading

Main News

Harry and Meghan’s US election intervention ‘violated’ terms of deal with Queen, say senior aides

Published

on

By

harry and meghans us election intervention violated terms of deal with queen say senior aides

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle‘s US election intervention ‘violated’ the terms of the ‘Megxit’ deal the couple have the the Queen, senior royal aides have claimed.

Their comments could further risk their links to the monarchy, with sources claiming that senior courtiers are discussing how to further distance London royals from the couple.

In their message, Harry and Meghan called on American voters to ‘reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity’ in ‘the most important election of our life.’

Their comments, which came in a Time 100 video to go with the publication of this year’s list of the most influential people, have been widely interpreted to be a swipe at U.S. president Donald Trump. The list does not include the royal couple.

Members of the royal family are supposed to be politically neutral, and under the Sandringham accord – agreed in March when the pair quit their royal duties – the Sussexes vowed that ‘everything they do will uphold the values of Her Majesty’.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spoke out about the upcoming U.S. election, in a stark break with British tradition that prohibits royal involvement in politics. Senior sources suggest that in doing so, the couple broke their agreement with The Queen

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spoke out about the upcoming U.S. election, in a stark break with British tradition that prohibits royal involvement in politics. Senior sources suggest that in doing so, the couple broke their agreement with The Queen

However, according to The Sunday Times, royal aides have said that the couple’s comments last week have broken their promise from earlier this year.

‘The [royal] family are all wringing their hands, thinking: where is this going and does this abide by the deal to uphold the values of the Queen? The feeling is it’s a violation of the agreement,’ one source told the newspaper. 

The sources say that if the agreement is deemed to have been violated, Prince Harry’s chances of resuming his connections to the Royal Marines and other military posts he is said to hold dear could be under threat.

The arrangement the Sussexes have with the royal family will be reviewed after a year by The Queen, the Prince of Wales and the Duke of Cambridge.

The Times reports that the Queen agreed to keep the positions vacated by Prince Harry open during the review period so that he could return if it was deemed appropriate. One such position is the captain general of the Royal Marines.

‘The door was left open,’ said one aide. ‘There were some things that Harry hoped he could opt back into. He dearly wants to hang on to the Royal Marines and the military appointments. That will be harder now.’ This will likely come as a blow to the Prince. 

The couples’ roles as president and vice-president of the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust is also expected to come under review, and conversations last week reportedly even included whether they could be stripped of their HRH titles.

Currently, Harry and Meghan still have these titles, but are not allowed to use them.

However, one source told The Times that the view is they couldn’t remove Harry’s title, pointing to the fact that even Edward VIII kept his HRH when he abdicated. 

33665412 8776731 image m 69 1601162338613

Royal sources claim that the Monarchy was embarrassed by the couple’s comments, with one senior aide questioning what The Queen would say to Donald Trump should he make another visit to the UK after her grandson and his wife spoke out against him

Buckingham palace sough to distance itself from their remarks, with royal sources saying that the monarch had been embarrassed by the comments, asking what the Queen is supposed to say should Donald Trump have another presidential visit.

‘If Trump is re-elected and makes another visit here, what is the Queen supposed to say when her grandson and his wife have effectively campaigned against him?’ said a source. 

A spokesman for the Sussexes said: ‘The duke’s message is not in reference to any specific political party or candidate, but is instead a call for decency in how we engage with each other.’     

Harry and Meghan, now ensconced in an L.A. mansion, made their remarks just weeks before the November 3 elections with Americans in some states already going to the polls.

The Duke of Sussex urged people to ‘reject hate speech’ while the Duchess called it the ‘most important election of our lifetime’ in remarks which made waves on both sides of the Atlantic. 

Royal insiders voiced concern in Britain where the Queen and her family are expected to remain politically neutral at all times, with one saying that Harry and Meghan had ‘crossed a line’. 

Buckingham Palace also distanced itself from Harry’s remarks by saying that ‘the Duke is not a working member of the royal family’ and describing his comments as ‘made in a personal capacity’. 

Trump slammed Meghan Markle from the White House podium after the video message was released, urging Americans to vote and hinting they support Democrat Joe Biden. 

‘I’m not a fan of hers,’ Trump said Wednesday to a question posed by DailyMail.com. ‘I would say this – and she has probably heard that – I wish a lot of luck to Harry because he’s going to need it.’ 

‘As we approach this November, it’s vital that we reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity,’ said Harry – in a line some observers in Britain and the U.S. immediately took to be a plug for Joe Biden and a slap at President Trump. 

Harry is said to be hopeful that he can retain some military duties, but the video message is thought to have put his chanced of being allowed to do so at risk

Harry is said to be hopeful that he can retain some military duties, but the video message is thought to have put his chanced of being allowed to do so at risk

Said the California-born Markle, 39: ‘We’re six weeks out from the election, and today is Voter Registration Day. 

‘Every four years, we’re told the same thing, ‘This is the most important election of our lifetime. But this one is. When we vote, our values are put into action, and our voices are heard.’ 

For his part, Harry said: ‘As we approach this November, it’s vital that we reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity.’ 

Harry urged Americans to be careful about what kind of content they consume online.

‘When the bad outweighs the good, for many, whether we realize it or not, it erodes our ability to have compassion and our ability to put ourself in someone else’s shoes. Because when one person buys into negativity online, the effects are felt exponentially. It’s time to not only reflect, but act,’ he said. 

While many viewers saw Harry and Meghan’s comments as a thinly-veiled endorsement of Biden, a source close to Harry insisted the Duke was not referring to Trump or any other individual.

‘The duke was talking about the tone of debate in the run-up to an election which is already quite febrile,’ they said.

‘He is not talking about any candidate or specific campaign. He is building on a lot of stuff that he’s said before about online communities, how we engage with each other online, rather than specifically making any political points.’ 

How British royals are expected to keep out of politics  

Under Britain’s constitutional monarchy, powers which theoretically belong to the Queen – such as appointing ministers and approving legislation – are exercised in her name by political leaders. 

This system means that political decisions are taken by the elected government rather than unelected royals, while keeping the monarchy as a symbol of the British state and its traditions. 

The royals’ political neutrality, which the Queen has scrupulously observed for 68 years, is key to maintaining this balance and to preserving the monarchy’s popularity. 

A YouGov poll earlier this year found majority support among both Conservative and Labour voters as well as Brexiteers and Europhiles for maintaining the British monarchy.  

The Queen’s uncle King Edward VIII had to abdicate in 1936 because the government refused to support his planned marriage to American divorcee Wallis Simpson – fatally compromising his neutrality.   

While there is no law explicitly preventing the royal family from voting in UK elections, doing so would be an unacceptable breach of protocol.   

The Queen holds weekly conversations with her prime ministers and she is entitled to ‘advise and warn’ them when necessary, but the nature of her advice is never made public.  

Even her guarded comment that voters should ‘think very carefully about the future’ ahead of the 2014 Scottish independence referendum was seen as an unusual intervention.  

Prince Charles is known for writing lengthy letters to ministers on policy subjects such as agriculture, some of which were made public in 2015. 

William and Kate have also spoken out on the environment, launching a prize to tackle climate issues last year. 

Princess Diana – who like Harry and Meghan became semi-detached from the monarchy – was known for her campaigning on land mines, once allegedly describing the UK government’s policy as ‘hopeless’. 

Her involvement sparked criticism from some Conservative MPs, but the Labour government that took office shortly before her death was more favourable to her campaign.  

Advertisement

This post first appeared on dailymail.co.uk

Continue Reading

Main News

Stunning footage shows the Hindenburg Disaster in vivid color

Published

on

By

stunning footage shows the hindenburg disaster in vivid color

Remarkable new footage shows the Hindenburg Disaster in vivid color 83 years after it exploded mid-air and caused 63 near New Jersey.

More than 80 years after the Hindenburg Disaster became one of the most infamous aircraft failures in the world, a group have used artificial intelligence to improve and add color to the original news coverage that captured the crash.

Neural Networks and Deep Learning first shared the altered footage on their YouTube channel, as well as their Instagram page and Patreon, in February.     

They used Gigapixel AI, a standalone application that uses artificial intelligence to improve images, and DeOldify, an open-source artificial intelligence tool for enhancing images. 

In the video, the 804-foot-long zeppelin has just traveled nearly 4,000 miles across the Atlantic Ocean from Frankfurt, Germany, to the United States on May 3, 1937.

The massive airship, which had completed 63 successful trips, floated over New York City with relative ease as it prepared to touch down at its mooring mass at Naval Station Lakehurst in New Jersey.

LZ 129 Hindenburg (pictured) traveled from Frankfurt, Germany, with nearly 100 people aboard to the Naval Station Lakehurst in New Jersey in May 1937

LZ 129 Hindenburg (pictured) traveled from Frankfurt, Germany, with nearly 100 people aboard to the Naval Station Lakehurst in New Jersey in May 1937

33660206 8776349 image a 58 1601154980901
33660142 8776349 image a 59 1601154980905
Slide me

Pictured: a side-by-side photo comparison showed how the footage had been altered by Neural Networks and Deep Learning to add spectacular color to 83-year-old footage

As the Hindenburg prepared to land at Naval Station Lakehurst in New Jersey, the airship exploded into flames and fell 200 feet from the sky

As the Hindenburg prepared to land at Naval Station Lakehurst in New Jersey, the airship exploded into flames and fell 200 feet from the sky 

But suddenly, the Hindenburg erupted into into a horrifying inferno that quickly engulfed the airship in scalding flames and billowing dark smoke. 

The hulking airship fell 200 feet from the sky onto the grassy fields below.

The colorized footage captured the sheer ferocity of the crash as the fire crawled along the Hindenburg’s exterior and burned it to its bare bones. The Hindenburg eventually collapsed from the extensive damage. 

Radio journalist Herb Morrison had arrived to report on the Hindenburg’s landing, but when the Hindenburg went up in flames he famously exclaimed, ‘Oh, the humanity!’ 

The colorized footage captured the sheer ferocity of the crash as the fire crawled along the Hindenburg's exterior and burned it to its bare bones

The colorized footage captured the sheer ferocity of the crash as the fire crawled along the Hindenburg’s exterior and burned it to its bare bones

The Hindenburg eventually collapsed into itself after the inferno burned through much of its exterior covering and the interior of the airship

The Hindenburg eventually collapsed into itself after the inferno burned through much of its exterior covering and the interior of the airship

Pictured: Upgraded images from Neural Networks and Deep Learning show the Hindenburg Disaster in shocking detail and color more than 80 years after it crashed in New Jersey

Pictured: Upgraded images from Neural Networks and Deep Learning show the Hindenburg Disaster in shocking detail and color more than 80 years after it crashed in New Jersey

The U.S. Commerce Department determined the accident was caused by a leak of the hydrogen that kept the airship aloft. It mixed with air, causing a fire

The U.S. Commerce Department determined the accident was caused by a leak of the hydrogen that kept the airship aloft. It mixed with air, causing a fire

Firefighters and emergency crews approached the ‘twisted, white hot,’ steel as they attempt to save the 36 passengers and 61 crew members.

History.com reports that 13 passengers, 21 crew members and one civilian died that day as a result of the crash. 

Many of the survivors suffered severe injuries from the crash and had to undergo additional medical treatment for months afterwards.

Just last year, the last remaining survivor of the Hindenburg Disaster died at the age of 90.

Werner Gustav Doehner passed away in Laconia, New Hampshire in November, more than eight decades after the German airship caught fire and was destroyed while docking in Lakehurst. 

Doehner, who was just eight years old at the time of the crash, was on the airship with his parents and older brother and sister. 

‘He did not talk about it,’ his son Bernie Doehner told The Associated Press on Friday, adding that his father took him to visit the naval station years later, but not the Hindenburg memorial, itself. 

At the time of its completion in 1936, the LZ 129 Hindenburg was the largest aircraft ever built, and was the pride of Germany’s Third Reich. 

‘It was definitely a repressed memory. He lost his sister, he lost his dad.’

Back in 2017, Doehner gave a rare interview with the Associated Press, recalling the moment flames began to flicker on top of the air ship as hydrogen, exposed to air, fueled an inferno.

A total of 13 passengers, 21 crew members and one civilian died that day as a result of the crash on May 3, 1937, at Naval Air Base Lakehurst in New Jersey

A total of 13 passengers, 21 crew members and one civilian died that day as a result of the crash on May 3, 1937, at Naval Air Base Lakehurst in New Jersey

Doehner: 'I remember lying on the ground, and my brother told me to get up and to get out of there,' he recalled. Their mother joined them and asked a steward to get her daughter, whom he carried out of the burning wreckage'

Doehner: ‘I remember lying on the ground, and my brother told me to get up and to get out of there,’ he recalled. Their mother joined them and asked a steward to get her daughter, whom he carried out of the burning wreckage’

Werner Gustav Doehner was the last surviving passenger from the Hindenburg Disaster before he passed away in November 2019. Pictured: Fire crews and witnesses watched at the Hindenburg burned

Werner Gustav Doehner was the last surviving passenger from the Hindenburg Disaster before he passed away in November 2019. Pictured: Fire crews and witnesses watched at the Hindenburg burned 

33660200 8776349 image a 83 1601155141987
33660134 8776349 image a 84 1601155142055
Slide me

Pictured: a side-by-side comparison of photos shows the Hindenburg flying over New York City on its way to New Jersey in May 1937

‘Suddenly, the air was on fire,’ Doehner recalled.

‘We were close to a window, and my mother took my brother and threw him out. She grabbed me and fell back and then threw me out,’ he said. 

‘She tried to get my sister, but she was too heavy, and my mother decided to get out by the time the zeppelin was nearly on the ground.’

Doehner added: ‘I remember lying on the ground, and my brother told me to get up and to get out of there,’ he recalled. Their mother joined them and asked a steward to get her daughter, whom he carried out of the burning wreckage.

He would remain in the hospital for three months before going to another facility in New York City in August for skin grafts.

Pictured: the moment the Hindenburg went up in flames and crashed in New Jersey in 1937

Pictured: the moment the Hindenburg went up in flames and crashed in New Jersey in 1937

The U.S. Commerce Department determined the accident was caused by a leak of the hydrogen that kept the airship aloft. It mixed with air, causing a fire. 

 ‘The theory that a brush discharge ignited such mixture appears most probable,’ the department’s report said. 

Doehner and his family – who were German citizens – were on their way back to Mexico City, where his father was a pharmaceutical executive. Funerals were held for his father and sister there.

Doehner was born in Darmstadt, Germany, and grew up in Mexico City. In 1984, he moved to the United States to work for General Electric as an electrical engineer, according to his obituary. He also worked in Ecuador and Mexico. He retired from New England Electric System in Westborough, Massachusetts, in 1999.

He moved to Parachute, Colorado, in 2001. He and his wife of 52 years, Elin, moved to Laconia in May 2018.    

This post first appeared on dailymail.co.uk

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 DiazHub.